‘Old boys’ bullying club’ means 31% of STEM women plan to quit
Human Resources

‘Old boys’ bullying club’ means 31% of STEM women plan to quit

The 2015 Survey of Women in the STEM Professions [PDF] conducted by Professionals Australia reveals yet more negative findings about the industry. A lot of this hinges on the difficulties of balancing motherhood with a career – which is a life challenge to be expected – but more worryingly, a large percentage reported an old boys club of casual bullying. 

“Disturbingly” the report stated, a high volume of respondents had experienced discrimination (52%), sexual harassment (26%) and bullying (42%). Of those, only 23%, 13% and 39% respectively had sought advice on how to deal with the matter. The research also highlighted an old boys’ club that made it more difficult for women to progress and left them side-lined in favour of their male counterparts.

Nearly a third (31%) of the 432 women polled said they do not to expect to be working in their profession in five years due to lack of advancement, the need for a better life balance or the need for change or to gain experience. Needless to say they also tended to be less well paid, were more likely to work part time, and less likely to hold senior roles.

Now, it is easy to draw shrill conclusions from surveys of this nature. There is a big media trend towards highlighting how disadvantaged women are – a fact which is far less true in the west than other parts of the world – and can easily degenerate into pointless man bashing.  

Most research questions are also somewhat rigged to achieve a specific outcome… and as anything around female disadvantage does very well from a PR perspective, cynically speaking, it is always a good angle to take. It is also inevitable that the challenge of child-rearing will take a toll on one of the parents’ careers and this is generally a choice people make. Those real career obsessives are a breed apart and absolutely nothing stops them from clambering up that ladder.

Yet this said, anyone who has ever worked anywhere will know that casual sexism is rife. Just the words “hot” and “mumsy” say it all. And the manipulative perma-tanned lady who will shout about football round the office may well be better at playing this particular system than her quieter more talented sister. There are a worrying number of people promoted on no merit whatsoever – everywhere – and unfortunately gender is another thing which gets chucked into the mix. 

The one statistic that did strike me as particularly pertinent though, was that 41% of all respondents agreed that in their “workplace, advice or information of a technical nature was less likely to be listened to if provided by a woman than a man”. Now this might be a perception issue, of course, but the more people doubt they’ll be listened to, the more rubbish they tend to be at delivering. And that can’t be good for anyone’s career. 

PREVIOUS ARTICLE

«Global Highlights 2015

NEXT ARTICLE

APJ 2016: Startups, smart cities and “living labs”»

Comments

no-images

Dr Sarah Morgan on December 20 2015

Kathryn, I am really disappointed in the tone of this article. Basically "all of the stats - and now lets dismiss them all". Such an approach is actively harmful to the goal of gender equality in the work place, 'even in the west'. Your language choice is actively sexist and bullying: “shrill” “real career obsessives” “manipulative perma-tanned lady” etcetera. Your piece is, without a doubt, sexist. Strive to be better as a woman in leadership! As editor especially you have this power within your grasp. With a feminists hope for a better future, Sarah.

no-images

Kathryn Cave on January 04 2016

Dr Sarah Morgan - I take point your point and apologise for this. I think this is an extremely important topic and have covered it extensively over the last few years including our own research study into the topic in 2013 which produced some extremely worrying results. The trouble is it is such an emotive topic that it is hard to answer all naysayers (from both sides) and cover it a truly balanced way. In previous articles the comments have gone the other direction towards man hating, which I thought was equally unjustified. In this write-up I wanted to make sure I addressed any concerns people might have with this research in order to explain why it was important.

no-images

Dr Sarah Morgan on December 20 2015

Kathryn, I am really disappointed in the tone of this article. Basically "all of the stats - and now lets dismiss them all". Such an approach is actively harmful to the goal of gender equality in the work place, 'even in the west'. Your language choice is actively sexist and bullying: “shrill” “real career obsessives” “manipulative perma-tanned lady” etcetera. Your piece is, without a doubt, sexist. Strive to be better as a woman in leadership! As editor especially you have this power within your grasp. With a feminists hope for a better future, Sarah.

no-images

Kathryn Cave on January 04 2016

Dr Sarah Morgan - I take point your point and apologise for this. I think this is an extremely important topic and have covered it extensively over the last few years including our own research study into the topic in 2013 which produced some extremely worrying results. The trouble is it is such an emotive topic that it is hard to answer all naysayers (from both sides) and cover it a truly balanced way. In previous articles the comments have gone the other direction towards man hating, which I thought was equally unjustified. In this write-up I wanted to make sure I addressed any concerns people might have with this research in order to explain why it was important.

Add Your Comment

Most Recent Comments

Our Case Studies

IDG Connect delivers full creative solutions to meet all your demand generatlon needs. These cover the full scope of options, from customized content and lead delivery through to fully integrated campaigns.

images

Our Marketing Research

Our in-house analyst and editorial team create a range of insights for the global marketing community. These look at IT buying preferences, the latest soclal media trends and other zeitgeist topics.

images

Poll

Should the government regulate Artificial Intelligence?