China’s tech power grab should ring White House alarm bells
Business Management

China’s tech power grab should ring White House alarm bells

US president Donald Trump has, as on many topics, been pretty vocal about China. In typically understated fashion he claimed on the campaign trail that the world’s second biggest economy has manipulated its currency in the past to make exports more competitive. Or, in his own words: “We can't continue to allow China to rape our country, and that's what they're doing.” Now, notwithstanding the fact that most presidential candidates talk tough on China before dialling back the rhetoric once inside the Oval Office, there are things happening closer to home that President Trump would be better advised to focus on.

Last month, Microsoft lost one of its top artificial intelligence (AI) experts to Chinese rival Baidu. While perhaps not remarkable in itself, it is symptomatic of a worrying trend for the US: that the nation could be losing out in a field vital to the commercial prosperity of its technology industry and the long-term strength of its military.

These are concerns not helped by the presence of a Baidu R&D centre in Silicon Valley, and of Beijing-linked VC firms wielding increasing influence in the tech heartland of America. So what’s the new commander-in-chief going to do about it?

 

The power of AI

Qi Lu’s defection to Baidu to become the search giant’s new COO is not surprising. The firm has been investing serious sums in artificial intelligence in a bid to become a global leader. What has been surprising, however, is its establishing an AI Laboratory in Sunnyvale. The firm is now on a major hiring spree – presumably peeling off some of the country’s top grads in the process. That in itself should be a concern for a president hell-bent on making America ‘great’ again.

But there are other implications. Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used in military applications. In fact, the US Navy has been testing a Long Range Anti-Ship Missile said to harness the technology to help it avoid enemy defences. China is already looking to match these capabilities, according to the New York Times. This is a concern for the Pentagon, given the close links between China’s private businesses and the state. Suspicion of these links have in the past led to lawmakers banning Huawei and ZTE from competing in the US telecoms infrastructure market. 

Last autumn, a US government report claimed the number of studies published by Chinese scientists referencing “deep learning” exceeded those produced by their American counterparts. As if that weren’t concerning enough for the White House, Chinese government-backed VC firms are now putting serious sums of cash into funding Valley start-ups, according to The Information. It claimed:

“The funds typically don’t advertise their links to Chinese government agencies. Complicating the picture, they have a bewildering array of corporate structures connecting them to the government. What’s clear is that their limited partners are all either state-owned enterprises or government entities, whose funding is dependent on following Chinese government policy.”

The funds are also being matched by the likes of Chinese web giants Tencent, Alibaba and others. It isn’t all about AI, of course. But it’s happening on a big enough scale to cause a few furrowed brows in the Pentagon and the boardrooms of Silicon Valley.

 

Time for change?

These concerns are part of the reason why a group of US Congressmen last year wrote to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) asking to increase the scope of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). This is the body that traditionally investigates the national security implications of any M&A deals involving foreign firms.

It urged the GAO to consider:

Does the scope of the CFIUS review capture Chinese angel/venture capital funds being established in the US or Chinese investment in tech accelerators and incubators. Is there reason to believe it should?

Whether the new leader of the Western world decides to make this part of his mission to revive the fortunes of a superpower on the wane remains to be seen. In the nearer term the Pentagon would do well to try and rebuild trust with Silicon Valley and its smartest computer scientists. That relationship has been decidedly frosty ever since Edward Snowden exposed the true scale of government surveillance in the US. 

 

Also read:
Facebook + China = only one winner
South China Seas: a new hacker hotspot
Post-Snowden China’s cold war on tech continues
VPNs: The cat-and-mouse game in China continues
Watchdogs get tough on China’s US investments
A sticky 2016 start for Microsoft China
How far can China push its bid to control the internet?
The Hong Kong Protests and the Great Firewall of China

PREVIOUS ARTICLE

«News roundup: A Digital Geneva Convention, the new new graphene, and 3310 nostalgia

NEXT ARTICLE

Cyber-screening: Putting security on the M&A agenda »
author_image
Phil Muncaster

Phil Muncaster has been writing about technology since joining IT Week as a reporter in 2005. After leaving his post as news editor of online site V3 in 2012, Phil spent over two years covering the Asian tech scene from his base in Hong Kong. Now back in London, he always has one eye on what's happening out East.

  • twt

Comments

no-images

Walton Yang on March 12 2017

Why american train people from Communist China to become a top scientist? They all will go back to communist China and become enemy of the free world. I can write a long list of those defected Chinese scientists that was educated by USA, start from Qian Xuesen, use to be the head of Jet Pulse Lab that went back to China to help Mao zedong built nuclear program and Ballistic Missiles. Now a day there are even more when Communist China gained economic power.

no-images

Walton Yang on March 12 2017

Why american train people from Communist China to become a top scientist? They all will go back to communist China and become enemy of the free world. I can write a long list of those defected Chinese scientists that was educated by USA, start from Qian Xuesen, use to be the head of Jet Pulse Lab that went back to China to help Mao zedong built nuclear program and Ballistic Missiles. Now a day there are even more when Communist China gained economic power.

Add Your Comment

Most Recent Comments

Our Case Studies

IDG Connect delivers full creative solutions to meet all your demand generatlon needs. These cover the full scope of options, from customized content and lead delivery through to fully integrated campaigns.

images

Our Marketing Research

Our in-house analyst and editorial team create a range of insights for the global marketing community. These look at IT buying preferences, the latest soclal media trends and other zeitgeist topics.

images

Poll

Should companies have Bitcoins on hand in preparation for a Ransomware attack?