The End of an Error: Microsoft’s litany of Windows Phone mistakes Credit: Roman Pyshchyk / Shutterstock.com
Mobile Communications

The End of an Error: Microsoft’s litany of Windows Phone mistakes

In the end, Windows Phone is going out more with a whimper than a bang. Ever since Satya Nadella took over as CEO it has appeared to be the mad woman in Microsoft’s attic – cast aside, ignored as a source of embarrassment, regarded as a relic, or at best patronised with faint praise. And now it is being put out of its misery via the means technology companies employ as the equivalent of ‘ashes to ashes’ – promises to provide bug fixes and security patches.

The fact that the news came via a series of tweets by the very executive Windows Phone has become most associated with, Joe Belfiore, rather than Microsoft’s usual regimented PR approach was odd, but it seemed to me to be a suitably ragged ending to what has been a stop-start, zig-zag franchise.

There was always something wrong about the project. Microsoft owned the desktop and volume server and many expected smooth sailing to dominate the mobile waters when it launched in the mid-1990s. That never happened as breakthrough smartphone platforms such as BlackBerry and Symbian helped slow down its progress. In response, Microsoft tried characteristic ploys: integrating Office applications, making nice with ISVs, luring hardware makers and throwing money at bombastic marketing and advertising.

Fed up with failure, Steve Ballmer launched a final assault in 2011 but the relationship with Nokia was a disaster in almost daily instalments. Microsoft intended the alliance to provide a high level of integration between hardware and software and invested heavily in the relationship with the Finnish company led by former Microsoft executive Stephen Elop. But it also felt the need to move very fast as Apple and Android sped off with lumps of market share. Elop’s “burning platform” memo about Symbian became a wet blanket on sales of Nokia devices. It launched its Lumia Windows Phone products impressively quickly, but perhaps too quickly. The devices were elegant and the Metro tiled user interface was a welcome break from lookalike front-ends with geometric grids of icons. But, if the bugs were bad enough, then the lack of robust applications was worse – much worse.  

The premise of the Ballmer/Elop enterprise was that the world (read retailers, ISVs and mobile telcos) needed a “third ecosystem” to break up the duopoly of Apple/Android. That premise just might have been proven correct if they had managed to attract decent applications to the platform. As it was, ISVs turned in the occasional strong app, followed, often tardily, by half-hearted successors. Put simply, there weren’t enough apps and the ones that arrived were often late or outdated. Microsoft, as Belfiore noted in a plangent tweet, chucked everything it had at the platform but the days of bulldozing markets were over and in Apple, Google, Samsung and others, the competition was formidable and well drilled.

To continue reading...


Please login or register to view your article. If you do not have or do not remember your password, please click on the “Forgotten your password?” link at the bottom.
If you do not yet have a password but are an existing user, please use the “Forgotten your password?

PREVIOUS ARTICLE

«Eight things I learned about Satya Nadella

NEXT ARTICLE

Are tech companies responsible for IT-driven social change?»
author_image
Martin Veitch

Martin Veitch is Editorial Consultant for IDG Connect

  • twt
  • twt

Comments

no-images

MiniVision on October 11 2017

It is crazy, I agree that Microsofts work as a company tends to be sloppy with a lot of bugs and mistakes. Yet they are still the leading provider for software and operating systems. They certainly seem to have a monopoly

no-images

MiniVision on October 11 2017

It is crazy, I agree that Microsofts work as a company tends to be sloppy with a lot of bugs and mistakes. Yet they are still the leading provider for software and operating systems. They certainly seem to have a monopoly

Add Your Comment

Recommended for You

kathryn-cave

Blockchain For Dummies: What you really need to know

Kathryn Cave looks at the big trends in global tech

martin-veitch-thumbnail

What we know and don’t know about digital transformation

Martin Veitch's inside track on today’s tech trends

silhouette

Four hot IT growth areas to guarantee a big salary bump

IDG Connect tackles the tech stories that matter to you

Most Recent Comments

Our Case Studies

IDG Connect delivers full creative solutions to meet all your demand generatlon needs. These cover the full scope of options, from customized content and lead delivery through to fully integrated campaigns.

images

Our Marketing Research

Our in-house analyst and editorial team create a range of insights for the global marketing community. These look at IT buying preferences, the latest soclal media trends and other zeitgeist topics.

images

Poll

Should companies have Bitcoins on hand in preparation for a Ransomware attack?