Kathryn Cave (Global) - Steve Jobs: The Model of Inspirational Leadership
Business Management

Kathryn Cave (Global) - Steve Jobs: The Model of Inspirational Leadership

The day after the 1999 film "Pirates of Silicon Valley" was released, actor Noah Wyle (who played Steve Jobs), was sitting at home in his living room when the phone rang. "Noah?" said the voice at the other end of the line, "Yes," answered Wyle, "This is Steve Jobs."

Wyle told CNN Money that his heart started beating through his shirt. Jobs continued: "I'm just calling to tell you I thought you did a good job. I hated the movie, I hated the script, I think if you had spent a little more time and a little more money and maybe a little more attention to detail, you could have had something there. But you were good." The only response Wyle could think of was: "Thank you, sir."

I wonder if the exchange above epitomises the essence of inspirational leadership. Maybe it explains how Jobs managed to get away with his much publicised offensiveness for all those years? Perhaps these three sentences neatly summarise an approach to management, leadership and business. If Wyle's memory is to be trusted, those roughly 50 words make it clear that Jobs is a hyper-critical thinking man with power; they demonstrate that he can easily be harsh - but all this simply intensifies the value of his praise.

The nub is surely this: if Jobs was pleased, you would be desperately happy because he was not indiscriminate; maybe arbitrary, but not indiscriminate. Perhaps the dubious take-away for managers and leaders is that once you've convinced others that you know what you're talking about, you can be as nasty as you like because you've already proved yourself? You don't have to be of course, but you can be, and people will still respect you.

When Robert Sutton was researching his book, The No Asshole Rule: Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn't, he found a troubling volume of Silicon Valley leaders believed that Steve Jobs was living proof that being an asshole boss was fundamental to building a great company. The debate has intensified since Steve Jobs' death and the publication of his biography by Walter Isaacson, which revealed so much more about him.

Jobs may have been unbelievably vile to deal with, but his employees valued his opinion and cared deeply what he thought. This is critical, because leadership itself can be perceived as a particularly emotion-laden process. In an organisation, the leader's mood has some effect on his/her group. One theory is that leaders transmit their moods to other group members through the mechanism of emotional contagion.

But theory aside, what skills do organisations really need to thrive? In a recent survey to our lists we asked which skills professionals thought were lacking from their environments. The interim findings, based on a survey of 343 IT decision makers from Europe showed 23% felt creativity was lacking; whilst 40% felt senior technical skills were missing. This is interesting, though not surprising, as when people are asked what they feel is missing they will tend to focus on tangible things like "money" for example, rather than intangible things like "happiness".

The same could be said about qualities like "inspiration", "innovation" and "creativity". It is hard to say exactly what these are and even more difficult to guarantee what they will deliver. The fact is, unless you're in one of those creative ad agencies with funky chairs and exciting slides down to the car park, ‘floaty' qualities can be impossible to talk about with any real meaning. Would more "creativity" at your workplace make it better? I imagine it is difficult to say until it is there.

So what is inspirational leadership? In a recent article about Richard Branson, Forbes contributor Carmine Gallo jotted down what he felt were the seven secrets. This was the typical marketing-style checklist consisting of: igniting enthusiasm, navigating action, selling the benefit, painting a picture, inviting participation, reinforcing optimism and encouraging potential. Whilst I don't for a minute doubt all this is correct, I do wonder if Steve Jobs' example could provide a more prosaic answer: demonstrate you know your business and make others strive to impress you. The more successfully it is done, the more you inspire (on a sliding scale).

This is far easier said than done of course, and most people simply can't deliver like Jobs could, which might be why inspiring leaders are so few and far between. Maybe the best thing to do in conclusion is simply quote Jobs, "Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&D dollars you have. It's not about money. It's about the people you have, how you're led."

By Kathryn Cave, Editor, IDG Connect

 

PREVIOUS ARTICLE

«Krishna Gopal (Middle East) - Negotiating and Closing Deals with Middle East Telecoms

NEXT ARTICLE

Dan Swinhoe (US) - US Elections pt. I: Tech Companies Funding the Obama Machine »

Comments

no-images

Paul Billington on October 05 2012

So many of the observation are true to my own experience. Thank you!

no-images

Mahesh Chatnale on October 05 2012

Awesome article ! The way its presented is so fabulous that I think I didn't blink my eyes while reading this. Shared with my bosses and team too. Thank you very much for such a feast.

no-images

Milton Pedroarena on October 05 2012

Steve wass essentially a leader for effort and work focused on the moment. Also a leader in looking for the major efforts to produce the best. But he was a very difficult person to work with. Ohnly those capable of understanding his points o view about what he was looking for in the design of a product very useful for society. Due to his open spiritual studies and travel he was very open minded. Thanks for your time, best wishes Milton

no-images

Mick Farrell on October 05 2012

Very enjoyable, especially the Jobs quote at the end synthesising the argument. I agree the ad-agency style elements are non-core whereas Jobs addressed the core in his quote, and lived it. In fact his legacy and Apple's future will illustrate its continued embodiment (or not).

no-images

ed smith on October 06 2012

Excellent Article..I took notes

no-images

Winston on October 06 2012

If Jobs being a great leader meant it was becasue he was strung out for years on taking LSD and other mind-bending drugs, then NO he was not the model of Inspirational Leadership. I'd rather have a leader who set a better "drug free" environment than he suggested Bill Gates to also do.

no-images

Miles Rose on October 06 2012

It's not Jobs behavior that we should discuss, it's his results. Most companies play follow the leader. Most companies ask too many people what they think. Most companies end up with something that's bland, tasteless, worthless but safe. Jobs could afford to fail. It's this lack of risk taking which is killing big business. They can't grow the top line significantly so they shrink the bottom line. And soon there are less and less customers for your products. Where is Henry Ford when you need him? The best thing about start up culture is the unknown, the ability to fail, but in the words of Thomas Edison, you didn't fail you learned what didn't work. Increasing big business manages short term by the numbers. And they will either buy or go out of business from those who don't follow the leaders. You can't be like Jobs. It's not in your DNA. Want to know what works make your focus group a child, they tell the truth. I really don't k ow how the truth gets into those products which are micromanaged by too many VPs of nothing. In the theatre the writers owns the work in the movies te writer is the hired hand. We need more owners, less hired hands. It your not ready do go down with the ship your not an owner.

no-images

Michael Ayeh on October 06 2012

Kathryn great point and higher truth.

no-images

Michael Karagosian on October 06 2012

Brilliantly said. It's the message, not the method.

no-images

WW on October 06 2012

Why would a "leader" want to be nasty and mean-spirited? That is a less than human trait. Its so easy to be positive and affirming to your fellow man, including those who work for you. I do not respect Jobs for the style he preferred. We all have the potential to rise above a mean spirit.

no-images

Marie Sternquist on October 07 2012

There is a magical quality called Ethics Presence--which is exactly what Steve Jobs had and was admired for having. He got away with a lot and had a tremendously loyal employee following despite sometimes being a bit harsh in his communication. How did he do that? He was right most of the time and therefore staff were winning because in that rightness Apple and their jobs were successful. A thing is either done or it isn't; not getting it done (which is the same as doing something else instead or doing it incorrectly) will hold others on the team up, everyone loses. It does take a lot sometimes to work next to a person of true Power. These are people who get things done and do not accept reasonableness or excuses knowing fully the cost of these to those individuals who are counting on the health of their business and jobs.

no-images

Glenn Hill on October 07 2012

Steve Jobs was the most influential inventor, since Thomas Edison. I think Branson's Seven Points are more useful as a guide to becoming a leader than the conclusion of this article. "demonstrate you know your business and make others strive to impress you." From reading Steve Job's biography it was evident he did all the things Branson listed. Sometimes in an appalling manner, but it is evident he 'mellowed' as he matured into a CEO. An extremely influential leader in his field? YES. Did all of Branson's Seven points? YES. A model for management that others should attempt to replicate. NO. Here is to the greatest inventor of the last 100 years.

no-images

James D on October 07 2012

I agree with WW. Steve Jobs died when he was at the top of his game. So now he's a myth, like James Dean and Marilyn Monroe. Seem to me that SJ's way was rather like the way of the Sith - anything's OK provided you're ruthless and powerful enough to pull it off. Heaven help him if his career had peaked while he was still alive, and he found himself actually needing people on the way down. IMO, this article's analysis of SJ's leadership style is rather narrow in scope. It focuses only on what happens "on the way up", and says nothing about the wider ethical ramifications of a leadership style. We have ethics because we're social creatures and we need each other, not because we're soft in the head. Most would-be leaders know that there are only a few leadership positions in the world powerful enough to let you get away with SJ-style behaviour. Going down that path is making a huge bet on occupying one of them before you stall.

no-images

James Howison on October 08 2012

So many companies talk about creating an innovative or transformational environment, without creating some basic stepping stones to get there. If its just a fuzzy goal you are going to get fuzzy results... right! Simple things like giving employees somewhere to log ideas and get feedback on them, forming think tanks to look for better approaches, rewarding even the smallest innovation, setting big goals & entrusting your people to propose innovative approaches. I know a company that gives employees 20% of their time to work on pet projects.... expensive yes but their products are best in class.

no-images

Christopher S. Rollyson on October 08 2012

@kathryn, thanks for continuing to try to crack the code on what made Steve Jobs great. I never met Steve or worked with him, but I'll offer another angle: I think everyone is distracted by the "abrasiveness" aspect of his demeanor. Based on reviewing dozens of posts over the years, I've never had the feeling that he was harsh just to be it. I think what most people miss about Steve was that he was driven by a higher purpose, to make computing the best it could be, so people could create better, more easily. Everything he did served that purpose. I think that's why so many talented people endured his rough edges. Serving other people is what made him great. My tribute to him goes into more detail: http://bit.ly/stevejobsbycsr2

no-images

Ed Seymour on October 08 2012

I have often thought of the contribution Steve Jobs has had to our industry. Leadership is something difficult to put in words and more difficult to emulate. The only thing I would add to your comprehensive article is the following observation on Steve, he led by example and was relentless in the pursuit of excellence. We in the industry have a historic leader to follow in our hearts. Ed Seymour

no-images

Sohail Qureshi on October 10 2012

Most of the peoples in the world that have been praised for what they have done for community or for an organization happened after their death. You take hundred examples and will find that more than 95% followed this, so the question is, why we wait? Steve was a great inspiration, everybody has the right to follow the path that they feel will bring results. Being harsh or coercion is a way that also pushes the people to deliver their best, if people followed him and favourable results were achived, what's wrong with it?

no-images

Patricia Brooks on October 31 2012

I read this twice to make sure I captured all the key messages. I took notes and will be sharing this with teams both higher and equal. A great injection to any leadership intervention.

no-images

Paul Billington on October 05 2012

So many of the observation are true to my own experience. Thank you!

no-images

Mahesh Chatnale on October 05 2012

Awesome article ! The way its presented is so fabulous that I think I didn't blink my eyes while reading this. Shared with my bosses and team too. Thank you very much for such a feast.

no-images

Milton Pedroarena on October 05 2012

Steve wass essentially a leader for effort and work focused on the moment. Also a leader in looking for the major efforts to produce the best. But he was a very difficult person to work with. Ohnly those capable of understanding his points o view about what he was looking for in the design of a product very useful for society. Due to his open spiritual studies and travel he was very open minded. Thanks for your time, best wishes Milton

no-images

Mick Farrell on October 05 2012

Very enjoyable, especially the Jobs quote at the end synthesising the argument. I agree the ad-agency style elements are non-core whereas Jobs addressed the core in his quote, and lived it. In fact his legacy and Apple's future will illustrate its continued embodiment (or not).

no-images

ed smith on October 06 2012

Excellent Article..I took notes

no-images

Winston on October 06 2012

If Jobs being a great leader meant it was becasue he was strung out for years on taking LSD and other mind-bending drugs, then NO he was not the model of Inspirational Leadership. I'd rather have a leader who set a better "drug free" environment than he suggested Bill Gates to also do.

no-images

Miles Rose on October 06 2012

It's not Jobs behavior that we should discuss, it's his results. Most companies play follow the leader. Most companies ask too many people what they think. Most companies end up with something that's bland, tasteless, worthless but safe. Jobs could afford to fail. It's this lack of risk taking which is killing big business. They can't grow the top line significantly so they shrink the bottom line. And soon there are less and less customers for your products. Where is Henry Ford when you need him? The best thing about start up culture is the unknown, the ability to fail, but in the words of Thomas Edison, you didn't fail you learned what didn't work. Increasing big business manages short term by the numbers. And they will either buy or go out of business from those who don't follow the leaders. You can't be like Jobs. It's not in your DNA. Want to know what works make your focus group a child, they tell the truth. I really don't k ow how the truth gets into those products which are micromanaged by too many VPs of nothing. In the theatre the writers owns the work in the movies te writer is the hired hand. We need more owners, less hired hands. It your not ready do go down with the ship your not an owner.

no-images

Michael Ayeh on October 06 2012

Kathryn great point and higher truth.

no-images

Michael Karagosian on October 06 2012

Brilliantly said. It's the message, not the method.

no-images

WW on October 06 2012

Why would a "leader" want to be nasty and mean-spirited? That is a less than human trait. Its so easy to be positive and affirming to your fellow man, including those who work for you. I do not respect Jobs for the style he preferred. We all have the potential to rise above a mean spirit.

no-images

Marie Sternquist on October 07 2012

There is a magical quality called Ethics Presence--which is exactly what Steve Jobs had and was admired for having. He got away with a lot and had a tremendously loyal employee following despite sometimes being a bit harsh in his communication. How did he do that? He was right most of the time and therefore staff were winning because in that rightness Apple and their jobs were successful. A thing is either done or it isn't; not getting it done (which is the same as doing something else instead or doing it incorrectly) will hold others on the team up, everyone loses. It does take a lot sometimes to work next to a person of true Power. These are people who get things done and do not accept reasonableness or excuses knowing fully the cost of these to those individuals who are counting on the health of their business and jobs.

no-images

Glenn Hill on October 07 2012

Steve Jobs was the most influential inventor, since Thomas Edison. I think Branson's Seven Points are more useful as a guide to becoming a leader than the conclusion of this article. "demonstrate you know your business and make others strive to impress you." From reading Steve Job's biography it was evident he did all the things Branson listed. Sometimes in an appalling manner, but it is evident he 'mellowed' as he matured into a CEO. An extremely influential leader in his field? YES. Did all of Branson's Seven points? YES. A model for management that others should attempt to replicate. NO. Here is to the greatest inventor of the last 100 years.

no-images

James D on October 07 2012

I agree with WW. Steve Jobs died when he was at the top of his game. So now he's a myth, like James Dean and Marilyn Monroe. Seem to me that SJ's way was rather like the way of the Sith - anything's OK provided you're ruthless and powerful enough to pull it off. Heaven help him if his career had peaked while he was still alive, and he found himself actually needing people on the way down. IMO, this article's analysis of SJ's leadership style is rather narrow in scope. It focuses only on what happens "on the way up", and says nothing about the wider ethical ramifications of a leadership style. We have ethics because we're social creatures and we need each other, not because we're soft in the head. Most would-be leaders know that there are only a few leadership positions in the world powerful enough to let you get away with SJ-style behaviour. Going down that path is making a huge bet on occupying one of them before you stall.

no-images

James Howison on October 08 2012

So many companies talk about creating an innovative or transformational environment, without creating some basic stepping stones to get there. If its just a fuzzy goal you are going to get fuzzy results... right! Simple things like giving employees somewhere to log ideas and get feedback on them, forming think tanks to look for better approaches, rewarding even the smallest innovation, setting big goals & entrusting your people to propose innovative approaches. I know a company that gives employees 20% of their time to work on pet projects.... expensive yes but their products are best in class.

no-images

Christopher S. Rollyson on October 08 2012

@kathryn, thanks for continuing to try to crack the code on what made Steve Jobs great. I never met Steve or worked with him, but I'll offer another angle: I think everyone is distracted by the "abrasiveness" aspect of his demeanor. Based on reviewing dozens of posts over the years, I've never had the feeling that he was harsh just to be it. I think what most people miss about Steve was that he was driven by a higher purpose, to make computing the best it could be, so people could create better, more easily. Everything he did served that purpose. I think that's why so many talented people endured his rough edges. Serving other people is what made him great. My tribute to him goes into more detail: http://bit.ly/stevejobsbycsr2

no-images

Ed Seymour on October 08 2012

I have often thought of the contribution Steve Jobs has had to our industry. Leadership is something difficult to put in words and more difficult to emulate. The only thing I would add to your comprehensive article is the following observation on Steve, he led by example and was relentless in the pursuit of excellence. We in the industry have a historic leader to follow in our hearts. Ed Seymour

no-images

Sohail Qureshi on October 10 2012

Most of the peoples in the world that have been praised for what they have done for community or for an organization happened after their death. You take hundred examples and will find that more than 95% followed this, so the question is, why we wait? Steve was a great inspiration, everybody has the right to follow the path that they feel will bring results. Being harsh or coercion is a way that also pushes the people to deliver their best, if people followed him and favourable results were achived, what's wrong with it?

no-images

Patricia Brooks on October 31 2012

I read this twice to make sure I captured all the key messages. I took notes and will be sharing this with teams both higher and equal. A great injection to any leadership intervention.

Add Your Comment

  • captcha

Related reading

Dell

Business Intelligence

Exceptional Information Solutions using Dell Toad Business...

To deliver exceptional information solutions, you must build an internal brand that users can trust- and great tools have always been a secret weap

SAP

Business Logistics

A relentless drive for operational efficiency

Oil, gas and mining companies in West Africa operate in a demanding environment, characterized by tight and growing regulations, and high operating

Most Recent Comments

IDG Connections

  • conect
  • connect
  • connect
  • connect
  • connect
  • connect
  • connect
  • connect
  • connect
  • connect
  • conect
  • conect
  • conect
  • conect
  • conect
no-image no-image

Resource Center

  • /view_company_report/103/cisco-systems-inc
  • /view_company_report/697/dell-inc-intel
  • /view_company_report/1283/dell-sonicwall
  • /view_company_report/15/ibm
  • /view_company_report/624/interactive-intelligence
  • /view_company_report/1219/jama-software
  • /view_company_report/599/hitachi-data-systems

Poll

Which topic interests you the most?