Windows 10 browser beatdown: Who's got the edge?

Not all web browsers are created equal. In fact, it might startle you a little to realize how diverse the range of top-end browser software has become, if you came of age in the era of “Internet Explorer or go home.”

With about a third of all Windows traffic on the web coming from Windows 10 installs, according to figures from U.K.-based analytics firm GoSquared, and with Microsoft distancing itself from Internet Explorer in favor of the Edge just as fast as it can, it seems like as good a time as any to survey a few of the best browsing options for Windows 10 users.

A word on methodology – I ran each contestant here through three benchmarks (higher scores are better in all of them – see graphic below) to give a broad sense of overall performance, and put each of them through their paces by using them for both work and play. With the exception of the benchmarks, what follows are the subjective opinions of a working reporter who nevertheless does a great deal of web browsing. The five browsers – note that Apple Safari isn't a real option on Win10 -- are presented in reverse order of preference, with my least favorite first. Enjoy.

Networkworld/Jon Gold/Stephen Sauer

#5: Microsoft Edge

I have Microsoft Edge as a secondary browser (my super high-tech solution for having both my private Twitter and my professional Twitter open at the same time is to have them up in two different browser windows; yes, I know there are slicker ways to do this) and I spent a few frustrating minutes trying to figure out how to uninstall it, before I realized that Edge is embedded firmly into the guts of Windows 10, and that it’s not really something you install and uninstall. In fact, it turns out that you literally can’t get rid of it, even if you really want to.

Getting into a full-fledged examination of user freedom and choice, and the precise philosophical reasons that it’s stupid and invasive to take away users’ control of the software that runs on their own computers isn’t really the point of the article, but I can’t just elide the issue, either. The argument that Edge and Cortana are just so integral to the basic functionality of a desktop OS is silly – if a web browser and a voice/search assistant really are key underpinnings of the entire structure, that’s ridiculous design. If they’re not, stop pretending they are and let me get rid of them.

+ ALSO ON NETWORK WORLD: A visual history of Microsoft’s Internet Explorer |

Rant over. I fully realize this is not a unique problem on Windows 10, and that Microsoft makes it easy enough to simply avoid Edge and Cortana if you’d prefer. (And if I really wanted to talk about Microsoft and user choice, we’d be here for another 10,000 words.)

Funnily enough, one of the chief headaches I ran into when using Edge was not Microsoft’s fault, but Google’s – I spend a lot of time in Google’s app ecosystem, and the frequent screenpops that said something like “Hey, you could be doing this exact same thing in Chrome!” got irritating pretty quickly. I get it, Google, but I’ve got this comparative review to write. Back off. (This was a problem when using Firefox, also.)

Benchmark-wise, it’s not terribly impressive next to Chrome and the two other Chrome-based browsers in our comparison, though I didn’t find it to be noticeably less responsive than any of the rest in standard usage. The interface is highly Metro, with all that that entails – menus are simplified, everything looks kind of blocky and stripped-down. If you enjoy the Metro visuals and method of interacting with software, you’re going to like Edge. If you hate it like poison, you probably won’t. I’m Metro-agnostic, personally – I think Edge is visually attractive, but I’m less than crazy about the way the menus are structured along the side of the window.

It’s at the bottom of the rankings not because it’s a bad browser, but because I can’t think why you’d use it instead of the other browsers on the list – the ability to draw on a page with web notes is neat, but sharing is a bit clunky and you have to use Metro apps to do it. The interface is good enough, it’s nice to look at, but I’m going elsewhere for my everyday browsing, thanks.

#4: Google Chrome

Increasingly the web’s default browser, Chrome’s been my daily driver for about six years. (I was a Firefox guy for probably five years before that.) Thusly, it’s a little tough to talk about as anything but a baseline for me, but I’ll take a stab at it.

Installation is very quick indeed, though I dislike the checked-by-default “make Chrome my default browser” box in the installer – more on principle than anything else. There are far more insidious checked-by-default boxes in other web installers – Java’s infamous partnership with the Ask Toolbar is a good example – which, because people have learned to click straight through these things so quickly, amount to an attempt to sneak something past our overloaded attention spans.

But where browsers are concerned, of course, it’s hardly an unusual feature, and it’s not difficult to fix the problem if you thoughtlessly click past it without meaning to.

Like Firefox, Chrome appears to retain settings, extensions and even history unless you tell the uninstaller otherwise. Chrome Extensions let you add a huge array of new capabilities to the browser, and are characteristically simple to search out and install.

That’s what Chrome’s all about – simplicity. Google’s browser is streamlined, fast and intuitive. It’s childishly easy to set up, import your bookmarks, and get to browsing. Because that’s what Google wants you to do.

Google’s apparently less interested in making it easy for you to dig down under the hood to change meaningful things about the way Chrome works, however – that’s time you could be spending providing useful ad targeting data to the Great Machine God having a great old time on the internet. Some – admittedly fairly advanced – settings are hidden in the ://flags page, and the main settings tab has the feel of an afterthought.

It can also be a bit of a memory hog – if you look in the task manager, you’ll note that Chrome exists in several different processes at once. This isn’t unusual for modern browsers, but if you’ve got an older machine without a great deal of RAM,

I was going to say something along the lines of “that’s probably OK for the rank and file of internet users,” but what the heck do I really know about what the average internet user wants, or whether there is even such a thing as an “average internet user?” The bottom line is that Chrome is fast, dependable and easy enough for even deeply untechnical people to get accustomed to. But if you’re a more advanced user who likes to tinker, it can be frustrating.

#3: Mozilla Firefox

Firefox’s installer is less pushy than Chrome and Edge – it doesn’t badger you about making it the default browser. It does appear to leave residual settings somewhere on your machine when you uninstall, however, as my bookmarks and add-ons from a previous install reappeared after reinstallation with no prompting from me.

That said, the experience of using Firefox is closest to what I think of as a more traditional web browser – it’s nicely customizable, there’s a broad library of add-ons, and it just works, in much the way that Chrome does, though it’s easier to dig into the settings in a more granular fashion.

FIRST LOOK: Firefox 48

Without question, it’s a capable, up-to-date browser with all the necessary features, even if it’ll always remind me of the computer labs in the journalism building at the

University of Iowa. It’s attractively designed – rounded tab curves are a good thing, and even a differentiator next to all the right angles and streamlined trapezoids – and its add-ons are still a superb value-add.

However, despite major improvements of late, it still doesn’t benchmark quite as well as Chrome or its derivatives, and that lag in performance is occasionally visible, particularly with a bunch of tabs open. It’s not crippling, by any means, but it’s a headache. So I don’t think I’ll be going back to the browser that got me through college.

#2: Opera

Opera was Firefox before Firefox was Firefox, only more so – a lonely alternative in a sea of Internet Explorer users, which came out in 1995 originally. It was initially known both for not being IE and for being one of the few browsers you had to pay for, though it became freely downloadable in 2000.

It was also known for high performance – even before Opera switched to Chromium in 2013 for its main under-the-hood components, it was regarded as one of the fastest browsers out there.  

It installs in a flash, asks for default browser with a prominent “don’t ask again” checkbox at first startup, and generally gives a no-nonsense impression. It keeps its historically high performance, doing roughly as well as Chrome and Vivaldi on the benchmarks.

The transition into Opera, however, has some bumps – it was surprisingly time-consuming to get my admittedly baroque and extensive collection of bookmarks to import from other browsers, since it plunked everything into an “imported bookmarks” subfolder instead of directly onto the bar. A small thing, but one that probably could’ve been handled more simply.

Still, once that was sorted out, using Opera was both pleasant and straightforward. It’s responsive and smooth and generally very excellent. I might even have made the switch to Opera from Chrome, but for…

#1: Vivaldi

Vivaldi, created by former Opera-ite Jon von Tetzchner (read my interview with him here), is a response to Opera’s perceived trajectory of becoming too mainstream – a feature-rich throwback, instead of a transparent and almost invisible window onto the web.

As you might expect from a browser whose avowed intent is to be the power user’s friend, the level of customizability in Vivaldi is very high, although that also means that some comparatively simple settings are hidden away behind an extra layer or two of menus.

The installation is simple and straightforward, and doesn’t bug you about making Vivaldi default.

It’s got a squared-off, Material Design-ish aesthetic – I found it a pleasure to look at and to use, once I’d gotten everything tweaked to my preferences, and I dug the fact that the top bar changes color based on the icon of the tab you’re currently looking at. (If you find this distracting you can turn it off by modifying the theme under the Settings menu.)

Vivaldi, like Opera, is based on Chromium, which means its most basic underpinnings are very similar to Google Chrome. That’s clearly reflected in the benchmark results, which are, once again, near-identical. Yet the experience of using Vivaldi as a main browser is different – where Chrome tries to make everything as seamless and simple as possible, Vivaldi wants to offer you the option to tweak absolutely everything about the experience within an inch of its life.

And, simply put, it’s successful in that. Chrome under the hood means I can keep the extensions I liked from before, and the huge flexibility granted by the wide range of options available, along with features like stackable tabs, means that it’s perfect for someone who spends a probably unhealthy amount of time every day staring at a browser window. (Hi.)

It’s visually striking, functional, flexible and fast – such that I’ve made the switch as of this week.

MORE: View our First Look at Vivaldi 1.0

IDG Insider


« Amazon Tap review: A disappointing follow-up to a great smart-home device


How to get your network and security teams working together »
IDG News Service

The IDG News Service is the world's leading daily source of global IT news, commentary and editorial resources. The News Service distributes content to IDG's more than 300 IT publications in more than 60 countries.

  • Mail


Do you think your smartphone is making you a workaholic?