Saving encryption: Thales on the future of quantum cryptography
Quantum

Saving encryption: Thales on the future of quantum cryptography

The prospects and business cases for quantum computing - while at times overstated - are undoubtedly fascinating. The theoretical advantages that quantum computing promises to provide for areas such as science, pharmaceuticals and the general enterprise are tremendous and our journey to getting towards a quantum computer that provides useful advantages over traditional computing is getting closer.

Many of tech's biggest names - such as IBM, Google, Microsoft, and Intel - are making big investments into the area, with numerous major governments following suit. The Trump administration recently passed a bill to provide $1.2 billion (USD) to quantum research, and similar moves have being made by the European Union - who pledged €1 billion to the cause - and China, which has investing billions of dollars in the technology for years.

While it must be said that we might still be a good while away from achieving what some organisations are calling the quantum advantage (i.e. developing a quantum computer that is better than traditional computing at a truly useful task), the future potential for these systems is both extremely exciting and somewhat concerning. That is, as quantum-level technology can be used to achieve a variety of amazing milestones in science and technology, it can also be used in negative ways. Perhaps the most pressing issue is the potential of quantum computing to completely disrupt contemporary encryption techniques, putting a massive amount of encrypted data at risk of attack.

Current standards for encryption rely on the inability of standard computers to factor large numbers, which serve as the foundation of many popular methods of cryptography. This raises a whole new order of cybersecurity concern for organisations, who might find swathes of encrypted data cracked open extremely easily. In order to address this issue, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has set out to find new standards in cryptographic algorithms that wouldn't be vulnerable to attacks from quantum computers. To achieve this, it started an initiative called the Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization project, which assessed a variety of new cryptographic algorithm submissions designed to be quantum-resistant.

NIST has now winnowed this list of submissions down to a total of 26, with 17 potential algorithms chosen for public-key encryption and nine chosen for digital signatures. These algorithms are diverse in their execution and represent a wide range of mathematical ideas, which NIST says is important in assessing the best possible approach to protecting data. In order to make sense of this list and to ascertain how organisations should approach issues in quantum cryptography, we spoke with data security expert Sol Cates, who serves as Thales eSecurity's VP of Technical Strategy.  Cates talks about the true level of risk that quantum computing poses for the security of huge amounts of critical data and what organisations should be doing right now in order to prepare for quantum attacks.

To continue reading...


PREVIOUS ARTICLE

« CIO Spotlight: Mark Hill, Frank Recruitment Group

NEXT ARTICLE

Secret CSO: Tom Conklin, Druva »
Pat Martlew

Patrick Martlew is a technology enthusiast and editorial guru that works the digital enterprise beat in London. After making his tech writing debut in Sydney, he has now made his way to the UK where he works to cover the very latest trends and provide top-grade expert analysis.

  • Mail

Recommended for You

International Women's Day: We've come a long way, but there's still an awfully long way to go

Charlotte Trueman takes a diverse look at today’s tech landscape.

Trump's trade war and the FANG bubble: Good news for Latin America?

Lewis Page gets down to business across global tech

20 Red-Hot, Pre-IPO companies to watch in 2019 B2B tech - Part 1

Martin Veitch's inside track on today’s tech trends

Poll

Do you think your smartphone is making you a workaholic?